Oh facebook! You're the ultimate device for procrastination but
sometimes you bring amazing discoveries that I would otherwise know nothing about.
Lolita is one of my favourite novels. I'm not much for re-readings but I came back to it this year because enough time had passed and wanted to read it in English - I read
Lolita as a teenager; I don't think I was ready for it, much of its humour was lost to me back then.
Just like teenage me was unprepared for the irony and the sense of humour that Nabokov expressed in his novel, I think many readers have missed the point when it comes to understand what is really going on between Lolita and Humbert. The very name "Lolita" is now used to refer to a
femme fatale figure, a barely legal temptress, a wicked and hypersexualized child (unfortunate I have to say, Lolita or Lola are very common names in Spain). Well, we read the story written by the hands of a deluded man, a rapist and pedophile so are we to take what he says and believes at face value? How on earth did we end up glamourising the idea of a girl being the victim of sexual abuse?
This conception has been replicated
ad nauseam in the cover books. Some years ago,
John Bertram counteracted and sponsored a design competition to see alternative takes on this novel. Some of my favourites:
You can see the rest and read an interview with Bertram
here.
And according to the source, we
Lolita fans are in luck! Next month will see published a book based on the competition,
Lolita: Story of a Cover Girl, a selection of critical essays on the topic of the treatment of Lolita in the covers.